0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.
MEG beefing up thundersnow- thoughts? Seen this forecasted before but not materialize except once when NOT forecasted.
As Frank Drebin would say, "Move along, there's nothing to see here."
The forecaster wrote MEG's AFD this morning posted this cross section analysis from the 6z NAM (that was referenced in the AFD). This is a classic slantwise convection setup that produces thundersnow under 500mb deformation axes. https://twitter.com/TTrogdon/status/690169616233013248Does have to verify of course. But all the modeled dynamical indicators suggest thunder would be a high probability. This isn't your average synoptic-scale snowstorm setup.
One thought on the ground temps worries, I still have some pack here my ground is still covered. Even if it warms up today to a whopping 38 like my high is projected, I just can't see it taking too long to stick. My point is the ground cannot be that warm, and I just can't see it being a huge factor in snow totals, but just watch me be wrong.LOL!
I stayed up reading papers on slantwise convection waiting for the AFD this morning lol