0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
People using the Wunderground maps need to take extreme caution...its WAY overdoing amounts...actual data for instance would show little if any snow in Memphis despite the maps showing 'several' inches.
Buzz. Kill.
What's wrong with them Kevin? Are you saying the text data doesn't support it?As far as I can tell - 850s are plenty cold, the surface is wetbulbing to freezing for those north of I40. BL issues? Ratio problems?
I'm looking at some text data (which I can't post here)...and its not as good as the snow output maps. Wunderground is doing something weird much like the Twisterdata maps for NAM/GFS that's way overdoing it. Nashville is still getting some snow...but its mostly Northwest and North Middle sections...and would probably see a late changeover...the stuff on the southern end would be pretty much all rain all together...
Liking this......although, I find it interesting that when the model doesn't have us in the bullseye, we say, "Well, I wouldn't want to be in the bullseye at this range anyway."But, when the model does show us in the bullseye, it's "Awesome! We're in the bullseye!"
Are you counting in the Evap. Cooling etc.? I have the text data too and while it is borderline its not that bad when considering the other parameters. Not to mention GFS trended toward it which makes me feel a lot better. Now showing NW GA even below freezing at the surface monday night into Tuesday.