0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Interesting Crockett, On one hand you ask people to chill out about the models that are just "so far out" (which I agree and is true) and then you turn around and do the same with the NAO/AO "relaxing"....So which is it? We should just quit forcasting past 3 days, or we should just forecast the information we cherry pick and tell others not to do what I just did? lol
Do what?? When have I ever asked anyone to "chill out" about models because they're too far out? Are you confusing my posts with someone else? Or have I posted something I forgot I posted?BTW, regarding the NAO/AO relaxing, as recently as yesterday the ensemble members were showing a VERY good consensus that the AO would rebound and rebound very quickly the second half of the month...however, that no longer seems to be the case. http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao.sprd2.gif
Teleconnections are a different breed of thing altogether. Looking at different teleconnection models is a tadbit different than "model-hugging" - which we're all guilty of. Since teleconnection changes don't take place overnight, I think looking at longer range models is needed when trying to figure out what's going to happen, which is the absolute opposite of looking at the GFS 300+ hours out. Those things can't be taken at face value even when their less than 60 hours away from an event, but since teleconnection models depict progged trends, they must be taken into consideration. Don't we all just love the winter discussions that come up EVERY year living in the south? I love it!
You picked one model to base this off of. The fact is that the NAO AO has never been a concern ending the month. Once there is snow on the ground we all can dance